thank you so much for your responce.
first why they are almost called the same way is that i use the skinn twice. The first one ran out of room and i thought it would be easier to dublicat the skin and us it a second time, but de data collected from the second one "must" be get somehow in the first one to make ik more readeble and will be intergraded more when i got this working.. the way i thought i could check this is to write it out in the first one.
the sent value is indeed a number from a formula. so yes you are correct is is a measure and not a variable, gled you point this out to help me understand this scripting.. i am still and always be learning this.
the skin is almost called the same but for the second one i added a 2. My thoughts were i have to sent it to the correct ini and that was the path, when i did this with #@#\crypto_eigen\crypto_eigen.ini it add a extra \crypto_eigen2, for that my sollution was the complete path.
i will came back when i did you suggestions
first why they are almost called the same way is that i use the skinn twice. The first one ran out of room and i thought it would be easier to dublicat the skin and us it a second time, but de data collected from the second one "must" be get somehow in the first one to make ik more readeble and will be intergraded more when i got this working.. the way i thought i could check this is to write it out in the first one.
the sent value is indeed a number from a formula. so yes you are correct is is a measure and not a variable, gled you point this out to help me understand this scripting.. i am still and always be learning this.
the skin is almost called the same but for the second one i added a 2. My thoughts were i have to sent it to the correct ini and that was the path, when i did this with #@#\crypto_eigen\crypto_eigen.ini it add a extra \crypto_eigen2, for that my sollution was the complete path.
i will came back when i did you suggestions
Statistics: Posted by Laaglander — Yesterday, 7:22 pm